Structure and dynamics of social world Name Institutional Affiliation The two words, reality and truth, have become so common in the society that they have lost their integrity. It is important to note that they do not they do not mean the same despite the fact that they have many similarities and characteristics. The standard of the two has to do with quality. Reality has no quality, but the truth has quality. This means that they have an objective difference. Authenticity is a term that means having a genuine original. It is what differentiates truth from reality.
Reality is riginal, which means that it is authentic, but the truth is not authentic at all. This debate on reality is important since these words get thrown around loosely with no consideration on their meaning. In most cases, people tend to think that whatever they perceive to be real is the truth, which is not always the case. This forces people to make uninformed decisions especially when it comes to dealing with a situation that calls for them to start determine what is real and what is true. This is what leads to the development of stereotypes.
These are people who make decisions based on n occurrence that is connected to something or to a specific group of people. A good example is the connection of people from the Arab world with terrorism by those from those countries in the west. This is not true since it is not everyone among those people from the Arab world who engage in terrorism or any acts of terror. Nature of self in social life In coming up with the interaction order, Erving Goffman was trying to answer the question about whatever makes society possible.
It involves the invisible, as wee as, the unspoken norms and rituals, which members of a society tend to follow when they are faced with face-face situations. Goffman was quick to note that most of our that is defined by the roles and memberships that an actor has in the society. It is for this reason that the connection between identity and the interaction order. The self is a concept that emerges out of the mind. The mind, on the other hand emerges and develops from interaction between an individual and the other members who make up the society.
Social interaction is what forms the basis of social structure. The mind, which is the thinking part, converts an individual’s actions in order to point out different meanings to the individual himself or to others. This is where language is again involved in the social interaction in a society. Language encapsulates meaning through the use of symbols, which provides the mind with the ability to point out meanings and to point them out to others. It is important to note that human beings have an ability of taking themselves as objects, which help them to reflect back upon their lives.
This shows that the self is both an individual and a social character. Due to the different positions that self holds in a society, he is bound to have many identities. All the identities are tied to some of the important aspect of social structure. The self may be seen as a father, a colleague, a friend and a relative in the same society. These identities have different concepts and meanings. For example, the self has a different meaning as a father and a different meaning as a friend. Identities bring about interaction between individuals who occupy different positions in society or organization.
This means that interaction is not about the whole person but it involves the roles and memberships that an individual has in society. Structure and dynamics of interaction order The interaction order that was proposed by Goffman can be said to be very analog nd very few innovations have been made from it. As it has been argued earlier in this paper, speech and use of language were some of the most important innovations that helped human beings in their quest to create complex societies.
There had been a few things that have been developed, which helped human beings to interact even better especially in the face to face situations with each other compared to those days when Goffman was writing his novel. Writing is something else that contributed to the alteration of the interaction order. Clocks, maps, phones and cell phones have elped in improving the interaction order and the transfer of information from one person to the other. This has enhanced communication between one person and another.
It is important to note that although communication has been enhanced, it has not affected the face-to-face interaction that people have when they are faced with such a situation. Structure and Dynamics of Social World In all aspects that involve human beings, the society can be found to play a very big role in defining whom a person is, and what how he or she behaves.. This is because there is no one who can live alone without interacting with the rest of the people. s made up of individuals who have different identities and ways of doing things. Social world may be used to mean family, friends and group or work in the global system.
How we view it and how we relate and interact with other people characterize the social world. During the course, it has become clear that there is a strong connection between reality, identity and interaction order when it comes to defining the behavior of a person or an actor in society. This means that there factors are the driving forces that define our relationship with other human beings. This aper will look at the connection between the structures of truth and reality, the nature of self in social life, and the interaction order, and how they relate to the social perspective of a human being.
My theoretical statement is that the social world of a human being is determined by how he or she perceives reality, how he views himself or herself, and the way he relates with others, and is made up of connections and interaction between human beings regardless of whether they are in conflict or harmony. Structure of truth and reality Knowledge and information are some of the important aspects that define a society. It has been found through research that people or human beings tend to absorb knowledge that they believe has been tested and found to be correct.
This knowledge is what people use as a guide to their own interpretation and reality. Acquisition of this knowledge is enhanced through the use of language. It is important to note that whatever happens in the social world has a very strong effect on society. This can be seen when it come to looking at an issue such as a divorce, which not only affects an individual but also affects society. Knowledge socialization is one of the important in he growth steps that help a society to develop into a social way.
Development of language and acquisition of knowledge enables an individual to develop in terms of creating their own reality. This is because reality is dynamic in the sense that it keeps on changing from one individual to another. Our social reality is defined by how we view the world around us. This affects the way we do see reality and how we do our own things. Language is one of the social guides to reality. This is because it gives an avenue through which people can share information. This sharing of information leads to acquisition of knowledge. Knowledge is what drives people to construct their own reality.
Language is something that is socially constructed due to the need of a society to assign labels to some of the important things in that society. Language has also been found to a tool for social communication. This is shown by the fact that people from the same ethnic group have the same language that they use to communicate. It has also been found that people living in communities that are well connected to other communities have no language barriers between them. This confirms that language is constructed to meet specific needs of a society, which eans that language is not static, but is constantly changing.
Language is what plays a very big role in social reality. It is important to note that language may lead to some conflict between different societies. This is brought by the fact that one society may attribute some actions to the other society, which may be reality according to the first society. For example, most of the western societies perceive people of Arab origin as terrorists. This according to the western societies is the reality, but it may not be true since not everyone who comes from the Arab society is a terrorist.
The nature of The self sways society through the actions of individuals. This helps in the creation of groups, organizations and institutions. The society influences the self through language and knowledge. This means that there is a reciprocal relationship between self and society. It has been found that we make conclusions that are based on our observation of how others view us. This is what determines our actions when have others around us. One can define the sense of self as a collection of beliefs that one holds.
These beliefs can be termed as reality from the previous section where I have alked about the structure of truth and reality. The self is both individual and social and has been found to be developed through the socialization process. Social- concept can be seen as the theory we have about ourselves, which is based on three factors. These are the way we view ourselves, the way we interact with others and how we evaluate ourselves. Self-concept is developed through our communication with others, which again brings the concept of language in development of a society.
This is in line with my theoretical statement that there is a strong connection between reality, self-identity and the interaction order. The evaluative part of self- concept is called self-esteem, which means the sense of self-worth. Self-esteem affect every part of our lives that are our relationship with others, our appearance and abilities. A person who has self-esteem issues tend to behave in a way that is far below the expectation since they may have a negative attitude on his or her own self. The sense of self-concept is what brings about the issue of identity.
This is because is usually a characterization of self as an occupant of a role in society. Identity is brought about by the understanding of whom we are and what other people believe s to be. Identity can also be said to be the behavior of a person in response to the surrounding society. It is a process that in which an individual interact with the society regarding his or her identity. This interaction must involve language, and it leads to a person having some beliefs about some concepts of life, which in the end leads to reality being created.
As stated earlier in this paper, reality is socially constructed, and it evolves from communication and acquisition of knowledge among individuals who make a society. Identity is what explains the behavior of a person ithin a group in terms of status. This shows that the self has many aspects that are defined and constructed by society. The society is static, which means that it keeps on changing. These changes must be incorporated by the individual in their own way of life in order to ensure an effective interaction with other members of the society.
This shows that there is a strong connection between reality, language and identity in human beings. The Structure and dynamics of the interaction order When social beings interact with one another, there is bound to be a difference in the way we interpret and do things. This is brought about by the differences in knowledge and information that different people have towards different things in a society. This means that if two people are picked from the society at random, they will act differently if they are subjected to the same situation.
Structure of the situation In most cases, social beings are faced with situations, which call for different motives to be used in interpreting of conducts by social beings. Situations involve a lot of dialogues and conversations among this taking part in that situation. This calls for proper language to be used in that particular situation. Motives are terms that are This means that in case we do something that needs an explanation, we must get the right motives to do so in order to convince the interested party.
For example, if someone fails an exam, he or she, must get the right language to use while trying to explain the reasons as to why he or she failed in that examination to his or her parents. When human beings are faced with alternative acts, they tend to perform one of the acts based on the consequences that may arise after the act has been completed. This involves looking at the overall situation that may be created by such n act, and whether the individual has the right motives to deal with it. The dynamics of dealing with the situation Social beings deal with situations in different ways.
This can be seen by looking by different accounts that people give when they are faced by a situation that has been subjected to an inquiry. There are two general accounts that people give when they are faced with such situations, these are excuses and Justifications. Excuses have been accepted socially, and they are used to relieve responsibility when conduct is questioned. There are about four main forms of excuses that are used by human eings when they want to relieve themselves the responsibility of dealing with the consequences of a situation.
These are appeal to accidents, appeal to defeasibility, appeal to biological drives, and scapegoating. Appeal to accidents is aimed at using the recognized hazards in the environment in explaining why an individual did an act. This is usually made acceptable since accidents do not happen regularly and if they do, it is not from the same individual or actor. People also use the appeals to defeasibility by arguing that all actions of social beings contain some mental element. One may defend his or her actions by saying that he or she was not fully informed, and he or she did not have certain knowledge.
Scapegoating is also another type of excuse that is usually used to explain the reasons as to why individuals did certain things. This means that a person may Justify that his or her actions by stating that they are harmless since they did not harm anyone. It is important to note that all these excuses and situations involve language that plays a very big role. Conclusion As it can be seen from the above arguments, knowledge and language are the most mportant aspects in the development of language.
This is because of the fact that it is used in all aspects of human life. It is also very clear that there is also a very strong bond between reality, identity and interaction order. This is because one leads to the other in a systematic way as discussed earlier in this paper. This goes hand in hand with my theoretical statement that these three factors are the most important players when it comes to defining a social being. References Davin, D. , & Morris, D. (2009). Hot Situations, Cool Heads: How to Thrive When Conflict Arrives. New York: Breakthrough Skills.